1. Introduction
The document under review presents a series of allegations outlining potential impeachable offenses that could be pursued against Donald Trump in a hypothetical second presidential term. These allegations span a range of actions, from the politicization of the Justice Department to corrupt financial schemes and the violation of civil liberties. This report aims to analyze the legal and logical basis of these claims, drawing upon relevant federal statutes, constitutional provisions, and provided research material to identify any errors in legal reasoning or logical inconsistencies in the application of law to the described scenarios. The analysis will examine each category of alleged offense, considering the elements required for statutory violations and the definitions of constitutional infringements, to provide an expert legal assessment of the document's assertions.
2. Analysis of Obstruction of Justice, Abuse of Power, and Politicization of the Justice Department
2.1. Using the Justice Department for Retribution
The document asserts that Donald Trump openly vowed to use the Justice Department (DOJ) to "expose" and take retribution against his enemies, characterizing this as an authoritarian move undermining the integrity of the U.S. legal system. It further claims that such interference in DOJ operations violates 18 U.S.C. § 1505 (Obstruction of Justice) and 18 U.S.C. § 242 (Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law), as well as constituting an abuse of power under Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution
Examining the potential violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1505, which prohibits the obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees, the provided material indicates that to secure a conviction, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt several elements. These include the existence of an ongoing proceeding before a federal department, agency, or congressional committee, the defendant's awareness of the pending proceeding, an obstructive action taken by the defendant (such as withholding or falsifying documents or using threats or force), and that the defendant acted with corrupt intent, meaning a deliberate and dishonest motive to interfere with the proceeding
While a public vow to use the DOJ for retribution suggests an improper purpose, a key consideration is whether such a statement, in isolation, constitutes a violation of § 1505. The statute requires a pending proceeding
Regarding 18 U.S.C. § 242, which addresses the deprivation of rights under color of law, this statute makes it a crime for someone acting under government authority to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States
The document also cites Article II, Section 4 (the Impeachment Clause), alleging that abuse of power for personal or political gain is an impeachable offense
2.2. Targeting Political Opponents
The document further claims that Trump has weaponized federal agencies to harass, investigate, and prosecute political opponents, including members of the press and Democratic lawmakers, mirroring tactics used by authoritarian regimes. This conduct is compared to Richard Nixon's abuse of power that led to impeachment proceedings and is alleged to violate the First Amendment (chilling free speech and press freedoms) and 18 U.S.C. § 241 (Conspiracy Against Rights)
The First Amendment protects freedom of speech and the press. Government actions aimed at suppressing dissent or retaliating against political speech can create a chilling effect, deterring individuals from exercising their free speech rights
The document also cites 18 U.S.C. § 241, which makes it unlawful for two or more persons to agree to injure, threaten, or intimidate a person in the United States in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States
3. Analysis of Bribery and Corrupt Financial Schemes
3.1. Trump-Affiliated Crypto Projects and Foreign Influence
The document alleges that Trump is engaged in a complex bribery scheme using cryptocurrency, stock manipulation, and pay-to-play access. Specifically, it claims that Trump-affiliated crypto projects, like "Trump Coin," have been linked to fraudulent investors under federal investigation, with strong indications that foreign entities are using these schemes to funnel money directly to Trump-affiliated businesses, potentially violating 18 U.S.C. § 201 (Bribery of Public Officials) and the Foreign Emoluments Clause (Article I, Section 9, Clause 8)
Bribery of a public official under 18 U.S.C. § 201(b) involves giving or offering anything of value to a public official with the corrupt intent to influence any official act, or a public official receiving anything of value in return for being influenced in the performance of any official act
The Foreign Emoluments Clause of the Constitution prohibits federal officeholders from accepting any present, emolument, office, or title of any kind whatever from any foreign state without the consent of Congress
3.2. TMTG Stock Manipulation
The document further alleges that Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG) stock allocations have been flagged as a tool for insider trading and illicit payoffs, with high-dollar donors and foreign investors being given stock in exchange for political influence, potentially violating 15 U.S.C. § 78j (Securities Fraud) and 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (Wire Fraud)
Securities fraud under 15 U.S.C. § 78j generally prohibits manipulative and deceptive devices in the purchase or sale of securities. If TMTG stock allocations were intentionally used to deceive investors or manipulate the market, such as by artificially inflating the stock price through allocations to insiders or those seeking political favor rather than based on legitimate investment, it could constitute securities fraud. Wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1343 prohibits using electronic communications to execute fraudulent schemes. If the allocation of TMTG stock was part of a scheme to defraud investors or illegally obtain money or property through deceptive electronic communications (e.g., using email or other electronic means to arrange the stock transfers based on political influence rather than legitimate business reasons), it could potentially violate § 1343.
3.3. $5M Mar-a-Lago Lunches & “Golden Citizenship Cards”
The document also claims that Trump has been charging $5 million per plate for secretive Mar-a-Lago meetings, effectively allowing wealthy elites to buy direct political influence, and selling "Golden Citizenship Cards" for $5 million each, allowing foreign billionaires to gain favor and access to the U.S. political system. These actions are alleged to violate 18 U.S.C. § 201 (Bribery), 8 U.S.C. § 1324 (Unlawful Sale of Citizenship), and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)
The $5 million per plate lunches could be considered bribery under 18 U.S.C. § 201 if the payments were made with the specific intent to influence Trump's official acts, and Trump accepted these payments with the understanding that they were in exchange for such influence. The extremely high price suggests that attendees might be seeking more than just a meal; the intent behind the payment and the expectation of the payer would be critical in determining if it constitutes bribery.
The claim that selling "Golden Citizenship Cards" for $5 million violates 8 U.S.C. § 1324 appears to be a legal error. The relevant sections of 8 U.S.C. § 1324 focus on the illegal bringing in, transporting, or harboring of unauthorized aliens
The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) generally prohibits bribing foreign officials. If the "Golden Citizenship Cards" were sold to foreign billionaires to influence U.S. policy, and this involved a quid pro quo with a foreign official (which is not detailed in the text), it might potentially fall under the FCPA. However, the focus in the document is on gaining favor and access to the U.S. political system, suggesting the primary interaction is with U.S. officials or the system itself.
4. Analysis of Unconstitutional Federal Overreach
4.1. Undermining Federal Institutions
The document alleges that Trump installed Elon Musk to lead the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which has allowed the mass reorganization of federal agencies without congressional oversight. This is claimed to violate the Appointments Clause (Article II, Section 2, Clause 2) and the Oath of Office (5 U.S.C. § 3331)
The Appointmethe advice and consent of the Senate
The U.S. Constitution grants Congress the power to establish federal government offices
The Oath of Office under 5 U.S.C. § 3331 requires individuals appointed to an office in the civil or uniformed services to swear to support and defend the Constitution
5. Analysis of Violations of Human Rights and Civil Liberties
5.1. Suppressing Dissent & Weaponizing ICE
The document alleges that the arrest of Columbia graduate Mahmoud Khalil by immigration authorities appears to be politically motivated, targeting him for his speech and activism, potentially violating 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Violations) and the First Amendment
42 U.S.C. § 1983 allows individuals to sue state or local officials for violating their constitutional rights under color of state law
6. Conclusion
The analysis of the potential impeachable offenses outlined in the document reveals several points of legal and logical contention. The claims related to obstruction of justice and abuse of power through the politicization of the Justice Department have a potential legal basis, particularly if Trump's public statements and actions demonstrate a corrupt intent to interfere with legal proceedings or use the DOJ for personal retribution. Similarly, the allegations of targeting political opponents could constitute violations of the First Amendment and potentially 18 U.S.C. § 241 if evidence shows a concerted effort to suppress dissent through federal agencies.
The bribery allegations involving cryptocurrency, stock manipulation, and Mar-a-Lago lunches would require demonstrating a direct quid pro quo to meet the legal definition of bribery under 18 U.S.C. § 201. The claim of violating 8 U.S.C. § 1324 through the sale of "Golden Citizenship Cards" appears to be a legal error, as this statute pertains to the illegal bringing in or harboring of aliens. However, such a scheme, if implemented without congressional authorization, would likely be unlawful under the principles governing immigration law. The allegations of unconstitutional federal overreach through the appointment of Elon Musk and the reorganization of federal agencies raise valid concerns under the Appointments Clause and the separation of powers, as the President's authority to reorganize the executive branch without congressional approval is limited. Finally, the arrest of Mahmoud Khalil for his political activism, while possibly not directly actionable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against a federal agency, raises significant First Amendment issues regarding the suppression of dissent through politically motivated law enforcement actions.
In summary, while several of the allegations presented in the document have potential legal grounds for impeachment, they would require substantial evidence to meet the burden of proof for statutory violations or constitutional infringements. The threshold for impeachment, defined as "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors," requires serious misconduct that undermines the integrity of the office and the constitutional order. The determination of whether the alleged actions meet this threshold would ultimately be a political judgment by the House of Representatives and the Senate.
Table 1: Elements of Cited Federal Statutes
Section | Statute | Elements | Source Snippets |
Obstruction of Justice | 18 U.S.C. § 1505 | Pending proceeding, defendant's knowledge, corrupt endeavor to obstruct. | |
Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law | 18 U.S.C. § 242 | Acting under color of law, willful deprivation, protected right or privilege. | |
Bribery of Public Officials | 18 U.S.C. § 201(b) | Giving/offering something of value, public official status, corrupt intent to influence an official act (quid pro quo). |
Works cited
1. Obstruction of Proceedings | 18 U.S. Code § 1505,
accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.thefederalcriminalattorneys.com/obstruct-proceedings
2. Justice Manual | 1727. Protection Of Government
Processes ..., accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-1727-protection-government-processes-omnibus-clause-18-usc-1505
3. 1725. Protection Of Government Processes --
Obstruction Of Pending Proceeding -- 18 U.S.C. 1505 | United States Department
of Justice, accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-1725-protection-government-processes-obstruction-pending-proceeding-18
4. 1736. Inchoate Obstruction Of Justice Offenses,
accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-1736-inchoate-obstruction-justice-offenses
5. Analyses of Section 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings
before departments, agencies, and committees, 18 U.S.C. § 1505 | Casetext,
accessed March 15, 2025, https://casetext.com/statute/united-states-code/title-18-crimes-and-criminal-procedure/part-i-crimes/chapter-73-obstruction-of-justice/section-1505-obstruction-of-proceedings-before-departments-agencies-and-committees/analysis?sort=relevance&citingPage=1&sortCiting=date-ascending
6. Trump pledges to 'expose' his enemies in political
speech at Justice Department | AP News, accessed March 15, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/trump-visits-justice-department-e9091e3721adda4d3ed39bd15119a0d4
7. Ranking Member Raskin's Statement on Trump's Lawless
and Dangerous Purge of FBI Agents and DOJ Prosecutors, accessed March 15, 2025,
https://democrats-judiciary.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=5474
8. Civil Rights Division | Statutes Enforced by the
Criminal Section, accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.justice.gov/crt/statutes-enforced-criminal-section
9. 18 U.S.C. § 242 - U.S. Code Title 18. Crimes and
Criminal ..., accessed March 15, 2025, https://codes.findlaw.com/us/title-18-crimes-and-criminal-procedure/18-usc-sect-242/
10. 18 USC 242 | Deprivation of Rights Under Color of
Law, accessed March 15, 2025, https://johndrogerslaw.com/18-usc-242-deprivation-rights-color-law/
11. What Sort of “Abuse of Power” Would Amount to an
Impeachable ..., accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.justsecurity.org/68233/what-sort-of-abuse-of-power-would-amount-to-an-impeachable-offense/
12. Interpretation: Article II, Section 4 | Constitution
Center, accessed March 15, 2025, https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/articles/article-ii/clauses/349
13. Chilling Effect: Discouraging the Use of Our First
Amendment Freedoms, accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.freedomforum.org/chilling-effect/
14. Chilling Effect Overview | The Foundation for
Individual Rights and Expression - FIRE, accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.thefire.org/research-learn/chilling-effect-overview
15. VICTORY: Supreme Court Rules Government Officials
Cannot Arrest ..., accessed March 15, 2025, https://ij.org/press-release/gonzalez-v-trevino-decision/
16. Ending The Weaponization Of The Federal Government -
The White House, accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/ending-the-weaponization-of-the-federal-government/
17. Justice Manual | 1739. Offenses Related To
Obstruction Of Justice Offenses | United States Department of Justice, accessed
March 15, 2025, https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-1739-offenses-related-obstruction-justice-offenses
18. Justice Manual | 2041. Bribery Of Public Officials |
United States ..., accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-2041-bribery-public-officials
19. Bribery of Public Officials and Witnesses (18 U.S.C.
§ 201) - Third Circuit Court of Appeals, accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/sites/ca3/files/2021%20Chap%206%20Bribery%20revisions%20final.pdf
20. EMOLUMENTS CLAUSE Definition & Meaning -
Merriam-Webster, accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/emoluments%20clause
21. Foreign Emoluments Clause - Wikipedia, accessed
March 15, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Emoluments_Clause
22. The Emoluments Clauses of the U.S. Constitution,
accessed March 15, 2025, https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/IF11086.pdf
23. Warren, Auchincloss Investigate Trump Meme Coins;
Raise Concerns about Consumer Ripoffs, Foreign Influence-Peddling, Conflicts of
Interest - Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.banking.senate.gov/newsroom/minority/warren-auchincloss-investigate-trump-meme-coins-raise-concerns-about-consumer-ripoffs-foreign-influence-peddling-conflicts-of-interest
24. The relevance of global cryptocurrency trends with
American political movements, accessed March 15, 2025, https://m.economictimes.com/markets/cryptocurrency/the-relevance-of-global-cryptocurrency-trends-with-american-political-movements/articleshow/117724106.cms
25. How an emboldened crypto industry is trying to
cement political influence | PBS News, accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/how-an-emboldened-crypto-industry-is-trying-to-cement-political-influence
26. 1907. Title 8, U.S.C. 1324(a) Offenses | United
States Department of Justice, accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-1907-title-8-usc-1324a-offenses
27. 8 USC 1324: Bringing in and harboring certain aliens
- OLRC Home, accessed March 15, 2025, https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title8-section1324&num=0&edition=prelim
28. 8 U.S. Code § 1324 - Bringing in and harboring
certain aliens - Law.Cornell.Edu, accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1324
29. Bringing in and Harboring Aliens | Title 8 U.S. Code
§ 1324, accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.thefederalcriminalattorneys.com/harboring-aliens
30. Sale of Naturalization or Citizenship Papers | 18
U.S.C. 1427, accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.thefederalcriminalattorneys.com/sale-of-citizenship-papers
31. Green Card for Immigrant Investors - USCIS, accessed
March 15, 2025, https://www.uscis.gov/green-card/green-card-eligibility/green-card-for-immigrant-investors
32. EB-5 Investment Visas | USA Immigration Lawyer
Modern Law Group, P.C., accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.lawofficeimmigration.com/eb-5-investment-visas.html
33. US EB-5 Visa Program - Henley & Partners,
accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.henleyglobal.com/residence-investment/united-states
34. EB-5 visa - Wikipedia, accessed March 15, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EB-5_visa
35. EB-5 Program vs. Proposed "Gold Card"
Visa: Legal Constraints, accessed March 15, 2025, https://natlawreview.com/article/why-president-trump-cant-just-re-write-rules-eb-5-programs-congressional-lock
36. Trump's Gold Card Plan Has Benefits But Legal and
Practical ..., accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.cato.org/blog/trumps-gold-card-plan-has-benefits-legal-practical-obstacles
37. Trump $5 million 'gold card' plan sparks immigration
confusion - VOA, accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.voanews.com/a/trump-5-million-gold-card-plan-sparks-immigration-confusion/7989783.html
38. What Exactly Is Trump's 'Gold Card' Route to
Citizenship? | TIME, accessed March 15, 2025, https://time.com/7261958/what-is-gold-card-trump-citizenship-route-how-it-might-work/
39. What to Know About $5M 'Trump Gold Card' Path to
U.S. Citizenship | TIME, accessed March 15, 2025, https://time.com/7261783/trump-gold-card-visa-permanent-residency-path-citizenship-eb5-million/
40. constitution.congress.gov, accessed March 15, 2025, https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S2-C2-3-1/ALDE_00013092/#:~:text=The%20Appointments%20Clause%20requires%20that,inferior%20officers%20in%20the%20President
41. Overview of Appointments Clause | Constitution
Annotated ..., accessed March 15, 2025, https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S2-C2-3-1/ALDE_00013092/
42. Overview of the Appointments Clause | U.S.
Constitution Annotated - Law.Cornell.Edu, accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-2/section-2/clause-2/overview-of-the-appointments-clause
43. Appointments Clause - Wikipedia, accessed March 15,
2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appointments_Clause
44. The Appointments Clause - U.S. Constitution -
FindLaw, accessed March 15, 2025, https://constitution.findlaw.com/article2/annotation13.html
45. The Test for Determining “Officer” Status Under the
Appointments Clause - Department of Justice, accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.justice.gov/olc/media/1385406/dl
46. Trump 2.0: A First Look at the Department of
Government Efficiency, accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.pillsburylaw.com/en/news-and-insights/department-government-efficiency-doge.html
47. Department of Government Efficiency - Wikipedia,
accessed March 15, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_Government_Efficiency
48. Department of Government Efficiency Faces Initial
Hurdles - Law Review, accessed March 15, 2025, https://lawreview.syr.edu/department-of-government-efficiency-faces-initial-hurdles/
49. Creation of Federal Offices | U.S. Constitution
Annotated - Law.Cornell.Edu, accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-2/section-2/clause-2/creation-of-federal-offices
50. ArtII.S2.C2.3.6 Creation of Federal Offices -
Constitution Annotated - Congress.gov, accessed March 15, 2025, https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S2-C2-3-6/ALDE_00000012/
51. Presidential reorganization authority - Wikipedia,
accessed March 15, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_reorganization_authority
52. Only Congress Can Create a Federal Office | Cato at
Liberty Blog, accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.cato.org/blog/only-congress-can-create-federal-office
53. The President's Reorganization Authority | The
Heritage Foundation, accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.heritage.org/political-process/report/the-presidents-reorganization-authority
54. Implementing the President's "Department of
Government Efficiency" Cost Efficiency Initiative - The White House,
accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/02/implementing-the-presidents-department-of-government-efficiency-cost-efficiency-initiative/
55. OATHS Statutorily Mandated Language of Oaths You
asked whether the phrase “So help me God” is required to be included as par -
Air Force JAG Corps, accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.afjag.af.mil/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=GW_7pLHI73A%3D&portalid=77
56. Page 395 TITLE 5—GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION AND
EMPLOYEES § 3333 - GovInfo, accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/5/3331
57. 5 USC PART III, Subpart B, CHAPTER 33, SUBCHAPTER
II: OATH OF OFFICE, accessed March 15, 2025, https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title5/part3/subpartB/chapter33/subchapter2&edition=prelim
58. Page 254 TITLE 5—GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION AND
EMPLOYEES § 3331 (1) The term ''active duty'' - GovInfo, accessed March 15,
2025, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2013-title5/pdf/USCODE-2013-title5-partIII-subpartB-chap33-subchapII.pdf
59. 5 USC 3331 - Oath of office - GovRegs, accessed
March 15, 2025, https://www.govregs.com/uscode/expand/title5_partIII_subpartB_chapter33_subchapterII_section3331
60. Federal Civil Rights Claims | The Maryland People's
Law Library, accessed March 15, 2025, https://peoples-law.org/federal-civil-rights-claims
61. How to File a Civil Rights Claim Under 42 U.S.C. §
1983: A Comprehensive Guide - The Sanders Firm, P.C., accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.thesandersfirmpc.com/how-to-file-a-civil-rights-claim-under-42-u-s-c-1983-a-comprehensive-guide
62. 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 and Civil Rights Lawsuits -
FindLaw, accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.findlaw.com/criminal/criminal-rights/42-u-s-code-section-1983.html
63. Anatomy of a Section 1983 Claim | Legal Blog,
accessed March 15, 2025, https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/blog/what-are-the-elements-of-a-section-1983-claim/
64. 42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil action for deprivation
of rights | U.S. ..., accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1983
65. 9.11 Particular Rights—First
Amendment—"Citizen" Plaintiff | Model Jury Instructions, accessed
March 15, 2025, https://www.ce9.uscourts.gov/jury-instructions/node/149
66. MEDIA DIGEST: CAIR-Chicago & Advocates Condemn
Abduction of Mahmoud Khalil and White House Use of ICE to Suppress Political
Dissent, accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.cairchicago.org/blog/media-digest-cair-chicago-advocates-condemn-abduction-of-mahmoud-khalil-and-white-house-use-of-ice-to-suppress-political-dissent
67. FFI Demands Immediate Release of Mahmoud Khalil -
Freedom for Immigrants, accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.freedomforimmigrants.org/news/ffi-demands-release-of-mahmoud-khalil
68. Khalil Fights Back: Legal Team Urges Court to
Protect His First Amendment Rights Amid Retaliatory ICE Detention - Davis
Vanguard, accessed March 15, 2025, https://davisvanguard.org/2025/03/khalil-fights-back-legal-team-urges-court-to-protect-his-first-amendment-rights-amid-retaliatory-ice-detention/
69. The Leadership Conference Condemns Trump's
Weaponization of Immigration Enforcement Against Human Rights Protesters,
accessed March 15, 2025, https://civilrights.org/2025/03/10/the-leadership-conference-condemns-trumps-weaponization-of-immigration-enforcement-against-human-rights-protesters/
70. ACLU and Democracy Forward Sue Trump Administration
Over ..., accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/aclu-and-democracy-forward-sue-trump-administration-over-expected-invocation-of-alien-enemies-act
71. Provisions against Acts under Color of Law (18
U.S.C. § 242) - Civil Rights, accessed March 15, 2025, https://civilrights.uslegal.com/post-civil-war-federal-civil-rights-acts/provisions-against-acts-under-color-of-law-18-u-s-c-%C2%A7-242/
72. Federal Bribery Defense Lawyer | 18 U.S.C. § 201,
accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.thefederalcriminalattorneys.com/white-collar-crimes/federal-bribery
No comments:
Post a Comment