The proliferation of the ‘software as a service’ (SaaS) delivery
model has fundamentally reshaped how businesses operate, offering unprecedented
convenience, scalability, and efficiency. This technological shift has been
instrumental in driving innovation and fostering agility across various
industries, making SaaS the default and often the exclusive format for software
consumption. However, this widespread embrace of SaaS has inadvertently cast a
long shadow on the global economic landscape, as its inherent architecture and
the competitive dynamics surrounding its provision have quietly cultivated a
substantial vulnerability . The concentration of critical infrastructure within
a small number of leading SaaS providers, coupled with the dismantling of
traditional security boundaries through modern integration patterns, has
created single points of failure with potentially catastrophic system-wide
consequences.1 While SaaS delivers numerous advantages, this centralization of
services by dominant providers introduces new and significant risks that demand
immediate and comprehensive attention.1
The inherent security paradox of SaaS lies in the very
characteristics that make it appealing. Its convenience and scalability are
intertwined with an expanded attack surface and a greater potential for
widespread impact from security breaches.1 The integrated nature of SaaS platforms, where a single
compromised identity can grant access to a multitude of interconnected
applications, allows threat actors to move laterally across systems with
alarming ease.2 This interconnectedness, while fostering seamless workflows and
data sharing, simultaneously magnifies the consequences of any security
weakness, outage, or breach . The historical paradigm of distributed software
across diverse environments, each with unique security practices, inherently
limited the scale of any single breach . Today, an attack on one major SaaS or
Platform as a Service (PaaS) provider can immediately ripple through its vast
customer base, creating a domino effect with potentially devastating economic
repercussions . Therefore, securing SaaS is no longer merely a matter of data
protection for individual organizations but a critical imperative for
safeguarding business continuity and the stability of the global economic
infrastructure.
The escalating threat landscape targeting SaaS environments
necessitates a fundamental shift in how we approach security. Traditional
security models, often predicated on network perimeters, are proving inadequate
against the complexities and distributed nature of SaaS.2 The imperative is to
move towards more adaptive and comprehensive security strategies that address
the unique challenges introduced by this dominant software delivery model.
The increasing reliance on a limited number of leading SaaS
providers has embedded a significant concentration risk into the global
economic system and critical infrastructure . Organizations, often with little
alternative, find themselves heavily dependent on these providers, amplifying
the potential impact of any weakness, outage, or breach . This concentration
transforms localized incidents into systemic risks, where a failure at a major
provider can trigger widespread disruptions across numerous dependent
businesses and sectors . The historical model of software distribution across
diverse environments inherently limited the scope of any single security
incident . However, the contemporary landscape, dominated by a few hyperscale
cloud providers, presents a scenario where a successful attack on one can have
cascading and far-reaching consequences, affecting a multitude of downstream
customers simultaneously .
The convenience of modern SaaS integration patterns, heavily
reliant on identity protocols like OAuth, has inadvertently eroded traditional
security boundaries . These patterns facilitate direct and often unchecked
interactions between third-party services and an organization's sensitive
internal resources . In essence, authentication and authorization processes
have become overly simplified, establishing single-factor trust relationships
between systems on the internet and private internal resources . This
architectural shift bypasses decades of carefully architected security measures
that enforced strict segmentation between trusted internal resources and
untrusted external interactions . External interaction layers, such as APIs and
websites, were intentionally separated from core backend systems, applications,
and data. Modern integration models, however, dismantle these essential
boundaries, creating direct pathways that, if compromised, can grant attackers
unprecedented access to confidential data and critical internal communications .
Furthermore, the intense competition within the SaaS market has
often led software providers to prioritize the rapid rollout of new features
over the implementation of robust security measures . This pursuit of market
share at the expense of security frequently results in rushed product releases
that lack comprehensive security features built in or enabled by default .
These oversights create repeated opportunities for attackers to exploit
vulnerabilities, exposing entire customer ecosystems to significant risk and
fostering an unsustainable situation for the global economic system . The
pressure to innovate and capture market share can inadvertently lead to a
dangerous trade-off, where fundamental security considerations are relegated to
a secondary concern, ultimately undermining the stability and trustworthiness
of the SaaS model.
The past year has witnessed a concerning surge in cybersecurity
incidents involving major SaaS providers, serving as stark reminders of the
vulnerabilities inherent in this delivery model. In March 2025, a significant
breach of Oracle Cloud resulted in the exfiltration of 6 million records,
impacting over 140,000 tenants.3 This incident, attributed to the exploitation of a known
vulnerability in Oracle Fusion Middleware, specifically CVE-2021-35587
affecting Oracle Access Manager, exposed sensitive authentication data and
raised concerns about potential credential compromise.3 The targeted subdomain
was running an outdated version of the software, highlighting the critical need
for robust patch management practices.3
The year 2024 saw an alarming 300% increase in SaaS breaches,
impacting major technology and telecommunications companies like Microsoft and
AT&T.2 This surge underscores
a significant shift in the cyber threat landscape, aligning with the
exponential growth in SaaS adoption.5 These breaches serve as clear indicators that the increasing
reliance on SaaS is accompanied by a corresponding rise in security risks.
In February 2025, Genea, a prominent fertility clinic in
Australia, suffered a ransomware attack that led to the theft of 940GB of
sensitive patient data, including medical records and personal details, which
were subsequently leaked on the dark web.11 The same month, Bybit, a major cryptocurrency exchange,
experienced a security breach resulting in the theft of $1.5 billion worth of
Ethereum, highlighting the high-value targets that SaaS platforms can represent
for cybercriminals.11
A notable campaign in 2024 targeted customers of Snowflake,
including Ticketmaster, Santander Bank, and AT&T.2 These breaches were
attributed to customer-side issues, primarily the lack of enforced multi-factor
authentication (MFA), allowing attackers to leverage stolen credentials.12 The impact was
significant, with AT&T alone reporting the leak of 109 million customer
records.12
Microsoft also experienced a significant breach in January 2024,
where the nation-state actor Midnight Blizzard exploited a series of
misconfigurations to access sensitive company emails and, subsequently, source
code.12 The attackers initially
gained access through a password spray attack on an account lacking MFA and
then leveraged a legacy OAuth application with excessive privileges.12
In April 2024, Dropbox Sign suffered a breach due to compromised
privileged service accounts, leading to the exposure of sensitive customer
data, including emails, usernames, and hashed passwords.11 This incident
underscored the persistent challenges in securing non-human identities within
SaaS environments.12
These incidents, among others, highlight the critical role of
identity compromise, misconfigurations, and supply chain vulnerabilities as
primary causes of SaaS breaches.3 The lessons learned from these events underscore the urgent
need for a more proactive and robust approach to SaaS security.
The vulnerabilities inherent in the modern SaaS landscape extend
beyond just concentration risk. Inadequately secured authentication tokens
present a significant point of weakness . Attackers are increasingly targeting
these tokens, recognizing that their compromise can grant direct and persistent
access to SaaS environments, often bypassing even multi-factor authentication
(MFA).19 Techniques such as
vendor compromise, malware, and adversary-in-the-middle attacks are prevalent
methods for obtaining these valuable tokens.19 The breaches at platforms like Heroku and GitHub serve as prime
examples of the severe consequences that can arise from OAuth token theft,
allowing unauthorized access to sensitive data for extended periods.20
The issue of privileged access by SaaS providers also introduces
considerable risks . While necessary for maintenance and support, the potential
for abuse or compromise of these elevated access levels is a major concern .
Privileged accounts, by their nature, offer a direct pathway to critical
systems and sensitive data, making them highly attractive targets for malicious
actors in SaaS environments.21 The principle of least privilege, crucial in all security
contexts, takes on even greater importance in the consolidated and
interconnected world of SaaS, where the misuse of privileged access can have
widespread ramifications.22
Furthermore, the opaque nature of fourth-party vendor
dependencies within the software supply chain silently amplifies the risks
associated with SaaS . Organizations often lack visibility into the security
practices of these downstream vendors, despite the fact that a significant
percentage of companies have indirect relationships with breached fourth
parties.23 These dependencies can
introduce vulnerabilities that extend far beyond an organization's direct
control, leading to severe financial, operational, and reputational
consequences if a fourth-party vendor experiences a security incident.24 The interconnectedness
of the SaaS ecosystem means that a weakness in a seemingly distant part of the
supply chain can ultimately compromise the security of numerous organizations.
Cyber attackers are rapidly adapting their tactics to exploit
the interconnected nature of the SaaS landscape, increasingly targeting not
just individual organizations but also the SaaS providers and their integration
partners . Threat actors have come to recognize the relatively vulnerable state
of these interconnected SaaS applications as fertile hunting grounds.6 The numerous
SaaS-to-SaaS connections that streamline workflows and enhance functionality
also create hidden pathways into an organization's most sensitive data, often
existing outside the purview of traditional security scanning and monitoring
tools.25
The reliance on modern identity protocols like OAuth, while
intended to simplify integration and enhance user experience, has also become a
significant attack vector . OAuth2's widespread adoption has made it a prime
target for attackers, and the complexity of the protocol often leads to
misconfigurations that create security holes.26 Consent phishing, a
sophisticated attack method, leverages legitimate authorization protocols that
use OAuth 2.0 to trick users into granting permissions to malicious
applications, providing attackers with persistent access to corporate SaaS
resources.27 Unlike traditional phishing, consent phishing bypasses
multi-factor authentication because it doesn't directly target user
credentials.28
The software supply chain, particularly within the SaaS
ecosystem, presents a growing risk . SaaS supply chain attacks are on the rise,
with attackers increasingly exploiting overlooked misconfigurations, stolen
credentials, and API manipulations to gain access to critical systems and
sensitive data.29 These attacks often involve injecting malicious code into
vendor software or leveraging compromised third-party services to infiltrate
SaaS platforms, demonstrating the evolving sophistication of threat actors
targeting the interconnected web of SaaS applications and their dependencies.30
The increasing prevalence of SaaS vulnerabilities and breaches
carries significant economic consequences that extend beyond individual
organizations to potentially weaken the global economic system. While SaaS
adoption has demonstrably led to reduced IT costs and fostered innovation, the
escalating security risks threaten to undermine these benefits.31 The global SaaS market,
projected to reach hundreds of billions of dollars, underscores the vast
economic landscape that is potentially at risk.32 The average cost of a
SaaS breach, now reaching millions of dollars, encompasses not only immediate
financial losses but also long-term reputational damage and the erosion of
customer trust.5
The concentration of critical infrastructure and financial
institutions on a small number of cloud and SaaS providers introduces a
systemic risk with potentially catastrophic economic ramifications.33 Central banks and
regulatory bodies are increasingly concerned about this cloud concentration
risk, recognizing the potential for a single point of failure to trigger
widespread financial instability.33 The lack of clear regulations mandating diversification among
cloud providers further exacerbates this concern, leaving the global financial
system potentially vulnerable to disruptions affecting major SaaS platforms.33
Regulatory bodies are beginning to address these risks, with
initiatives aimed at ensuring the resilience and stability of the financial
sector in the face of increasing cloud adoption.35 The Bank of England has
called for regulations promoting diversity in cloud providers, and the European
Union's Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) seeks to manage third-party
ICT risk within the financial sector.33 These efforts signify a growing awareness of the need for
regulatory frameworks to mitigate the systemic risks associated with cloud
concentration and the reliance on SaaS.
Addressing the escalating security challenges posed by SaaS
requires a fundamental modernization of security architectures, moving beyond
the limitations of legacy models that were designed for on-premise
environments.2 Traditional security measures, often focused on perimeter
defense, are proving insufficient in the face of the distributed and
interconnected nature of SaaS.2 The concept of a trusted internal network versus an untrusted
external network is increasingly blurred, necessitating a shift towards more
dynamic and context-aware security paradigms .
Zero Trust architecture has emerged as a critical framework for
modernizing SaaS security . Operating on the principle of "never trust,
always verify," Zero Trust mandates stringent identity verification for
every user and device attempting to access resources, regardless of their
location.37 This approach
eliminates the assumption of trust based on network location and ensures
continuous authentication and authorization across the entire digital estate.39
Complementing Zero Trust, micro-segmentation plays a vital role
in containing breaches and limiting the potential for lateral movement within
SaaS environments.40 By dividing the network into smaller, isolated segments,
micro-segmentation restricts an attacker's ability to propagate across systems,
minimizing the impact of a successful compromise.40 This granular level of
control aligns perfectly with the least privilege principles of Zero Trust,
ensuring that access is granted only to the resources necessary for a specific
task.40
Furthermore, the increasing sophistication of identity-based
attacks in SaaS highlights the critical need for Identity Threat Detection and
Response (ITDR) solutions.42 ITDR focuses specifically on identifying, detecting, and
mitigating threats targeting user identities and access management systems
within SaaS environments.42 By continuously monitoring user behavior, login patterns, and
privileged access, ITDR can detect anomalies and suspicious activities that may
indicate compromised accounts or malicious insiders, providing an essential
layer of defense in the SaaS security landscape.42
To further enhance control and resilience in the SaaS ecosystem,
several emerging solutions are gaining traction. Confidential computing offers
a promising approach by utilizing secure enclaves to protect sensitive data
even while it is being processed in the cloud.43 This technology
provides hardware-level isolation, ensuring data confidentiality and integrity
against insider threats and even the cloud service providers themselves.43 Deployment models like
customer self-hosting and bring your own cloud (BYOC) are also gaining
popularity, offering organizations greater control over their data and security
by allowing them to deploy and manage SaaS applications within their own
infrastructure.45
In addition to these architectural and deployment strategies,
the strategic deployment of Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASBs) and SaaS
Security Posture Management (SSPM) tools is becoming increasingly vital.47 CASBs provide
visibility and control over data and user activity within SaaS applications,
enabling organizations to enforce security policies and manage shadow IT.47 SSPM solutions focus on
proactively managing and improving the overall security posture of SaaS
environments by automating the assessment and remediation of misconfigurations
and vulnerabilities.47 These tools offer a centralized approach to monitoring and
managing the security of an organization's entire SaaS portfolio, ensuring
compliance and reducing the risk of breaches.48
Achieving a robust security posture in the SaaS era requires a
fundamental shift in priorities, with security taking center stage alongside
rapid feature development.45 Experts across the industry increasingly emphasize the critical
need for software providers to prioritize security throughout the entire
software development lifecycle, moving beyond mere slogans to demonstrable
evidence of effective controls.49 Fostering a security-first culture within development teams,
implementing proactive risk assessment strategies, and leveraging
developer-friendly security tooling and automation are crucial steps in this
direction.50 Furthermore, continuous monitoring, proactive threat detection,
and rapid incident response capabilities are essential for identifying and
mitigating security threats in the dynamic SaaS landscape.51
The challenge of securing SaaS is a shared responsibility,
demanding a collective call to action from software providers, security
practitioners, and organizations adopting SaaS. The urgency of the situation
cannot be overstated, as the escalating risks associated with SaaS adoption
pose a significant threat to the global economic system.
Recommendations:
●
Software Providers: Security must be
elevated to an equal or higher priority than feature development. Comprehensive
security should be built into SaaS offerings by default or enabled seamlessly.
Transparency regarding security risks and the effectiveness of implemented controls
is paramount. Continuous, demonstrable evidence of working security controls,
beyond annual compliance checks, should be provided to customers.
●
Security Practitioners: Collaboration is
essential to prevent the abuse of interconnected systems. Security
architectures must be modernized to optimize SaaS integration while minimizing
risk, with a strong emphasis on sophisticated authorization methods and
advanced detection capabilities. Proactive measures to prevent the abuse of
interconnected systems should be prioritized. Integration models that do not
offer adequate security should be critically evaluated and rejected in favor of
more robust solutions. Continuous SaaS security risk assessments and real-time
monitoring are crucial for maintaining a strong security posture.
●
Organizations Adopting SaaS: A
thorough understanding of the shared responsibility model is essential. Strong
authentication controls, including the mandatory enforcement of MFA, should be
implemented across all user accounts. The adoption of Zero Trust principles and
micro-segmentation is crucial for limiting the attack surface and containing
potential breaches. Organizations must gain comprehensive visibility into their
SaaS usage, including shadow IT and third-party integrations, and conduct
regular security assessments of their SaaS vendors. Emerging security solutions
like confidential computing, customer self-hosting, and BYOC should be
considered for highly sensitive data to enhance control and resilience.
By embracing collaboration, prioritizing transparency, and
adopting a proactive security posture, the future of the SaaS ecosystem and the
stability of the global economy can be better safeguarded against the growing
tide of cyber threats. The time for decisive and collective action is now.
Works
cited
1.
Risk
concentration in the cloud: How to enhance Resilience | Swiss Re, accessed
April 27, 2025, https://www.swissre.com/risk-knowledge/advancing-societal-benefits-digitalisation/risk-concentration-in-the-cloud.html
2.
SaaS
Breaches Skyrocket 300% as Traditional Defenses Fall Short - Infosecurity
Magazine, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/news/saas-breaches-defenses-short/
3.
The
Biggest Supply Chain Hack Of 2025: 6M Records Exfiltrated ..., accessed April
27, 2025, https://www.cloudsek.com/blog/the-biggest-supply-chain-hack-of-2025-6m-records-for-sale-exfiltrated-from-oracle-cloud-affecting-over-140k-tenants
4.
List
of Recent Data Breaches in 2025–2024 - Bright Defense, accessed April 27, 2025,
https://www.brightdefense.com/resources/recent-data-breaches/
5.
SaaS
security is under attack as breaches surge 300 percent | Okoone, accessed April
27, 2025, https://www.okoone.com/spark/product-design-research/saas-security-is-under-attack-as-breaches-surge-300-percent/
6.
Obsidian
Security, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.obsidiansecurity.com/news/obsidian-security-launches-2025-saas-security-threat-report
7.
Obsidian
report reveals 300% surge in SaaS breaches - SecurityBrief UK, accessed April
27, 2025, https://securitybrief.co.uk/story/obsidian-report-reveals-300-surge-in-saas-breaches
8.
SaaS
Data Breaches on the Rise - PDI Security & Network Solutions, accessed
April 27, 2025, https://security.pditechnologies.com/blog/saas-data-breaches-on-the-rise/
9.
Obsidian
Security Launches 2025 SaaS Security Threat Report Revealing 300%
Year-Over-Year Surge in SaaS Breaches - Business Wire, accessed April 27, 2025,
https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250127824236/en/Obsidian-Security-Launches-2025-SaaS-Security-Threat-Report-Revealing-300-Year-Over-Year-Surge-in-SaaS-Breaches
10. Obsidian Security's SaaS Security Threat
Report 2025, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.obsidiansecurity.com/saas-security-threat-report
11. Recent SaaS Data Breach Examples - Database
| Metomic, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.metomic.io/saas-breach-database
12. 2024 SaaS Security Breaches: Lessons
Learned - Valence Security, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.valencesecurity.com/resources/blogs/2024-saas-security-breaches-lessons-learned
13. Top 5 SaaS Data Breaches - SEM Shred,
accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.semshred.com/top-5-saas-data-breaches/
14. Recent Cybersecurity Attacks and Data
Breaches – 2025 | Intellizence, accessed April 27, 2025, https://intellizence.com/insights/business-signals-trends/major-cyber-attacks-data-breaches-leading-companies/
15. CrowdStrike SaaS Security Risk Review |
Infographic, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.crowdstrike.com/content/crowdstrike-www/locale-sites/us/en-us/resources/infographics/saas-security-risk-review.html
16. What 2024's SaaS Breaches Mean for 2025
Cybersecurity - AppOmni, accessed April 27, 2025, https://appomni.com/blog/saas-security-predictions-2025/
17. 12 Biggest Cybersecurity Headlines in 2024:
Key Insights for CIOs ..., accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.scybers.com/insight/12-biggest-cybersecurity-headlines-in-2024-key-insights-for-cios-and-ctos-for-2025
18. 2025 SaaS Security Predictions: What Every
CISO Needs to Know, accessed April 27, 2025, https://wing.security/saas-security/2025-saas-security-predictions-what-every-ciso-needs-to-know/
19. start.obsidiansecurity.com, accessed April
27, 2025, https://start.obsidiansecurity.com/rs/124-DIV-269/images/combat-saas-token-compromise-obsidian_sb.pdf
20. OAuth Token: What It Is, How It Works, and
Its Vulnerabilities - AppOmni, accessed April 27, 2025, https://appomni.com/blog/oauth-token-what-it-is-how-it-works-and-its-vulnerabilities/
21. 6 Alarming Risks of Overlooking Privileged
Access Management ..., accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.cloudeagle.ai/blogs/6-alarming-risks-of-overlooking-privileged-access-management
22. Observing Privilege to Reduce Risk in
Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) - Security Magazine, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.securitymagazine.com/articles/92195-observing-privilege-to-reduce-risk-in-software-as-a-service-saas
23. How to Manage Your 4th Party Vendors -
Aravo, accessed April 27, 2025, https://aravo.com/blog/how-to-manage-your-4th-party-vendors/
24. Managing Fourth-Party Risks: An Overlooked
Challenge In Cyber Security, accessed April 27, 2025, https://cybersecurityasia.net/managing-fourth-party-risks/
25. How SaaS-to-SaaS Apps Can Compromise the
Security of SaaS Environments - AppOmni, accessed April 27, 2025, https://appomni.com/blog/how-saas-to-saas-apps-can-compromise-security-of-saas-environments/
26. Common OAuth Vulnerabilities - Doyensec's
Blog, accessed April 27, 2025, https://blog.doyensec.com/2025/01/30/oauth-common-vulnerabilities.html
27. The Rising Threat of Consent Phishing: How
OAuth Abuse Bypasses MFA | Valence blog, accessed April 27, 2025, http://www.valencesecurity.com/resources/blogs/the-rising-threat-of-consent-phishing-how-oauth-abuse-bypasses-mfa
28. SaaS OAuth Attack Leads to Widespread
Browser Extension Breach - Valence Security, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.valencesecurity.com/resources/blogs/saas-oauth-attack-leads-to-widespread-browser-extension-breach
29. From $22M in Ransom to +100M Stolen
Records: 2025's All-Star ..., accessed April 27, 2025, https://thehackernews.com/2025/01/from-22m-in-ransom-to-100m-stolen.html
30. SaaS Supply Chain Attacks: Risks and How to
Stay Secure - Reco.AI, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.reco.ai/blog/saas-supply-chain-attacks-how-to-stay-secure
31. carijournals.org, accessed April 27, 2025, https://carijournals.org/journals/index.php/IJCE/article/download/2551/2978/7365
32. 35+ Key SaaS Industry Statistics To Know
Before Investing - OurCrowd, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.ourcrowd.com/learn/saas-industry-statistics
33. What is Cloud Concentration? Why are banks
worried about it? Is ..., accessed April 27, 2025, https://datacentre.solutions/blogs/57193/what-is-cloud-concentration-why-are-banks-worried-about-it-is-cloud-portability-the-answer
34. Finance, Multi-Cloud, and The Elimination
of Cloud Concentration Risk | MongoDB, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.mongodb.com/blog/post/finance-multicloud-elimination-cloud-concentration-risk
35. Cloud Adoption in the Financial Sector and
Concentration Risk | PIFS, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.pifsinternational.org/cloud-adoption-in-the-financial-sector-and-concentration-risk/
36. www.fsb.org, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.fsb.org/uploads/PIFS.pdf
37. What is Zero Trust? - Guide to Zero Trust
Security - CrowdStrike.com, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.crowdstrike.com/en-us/cybersecurity-101/zero-trust-security/
38. Extend Zero Trust to SaaS Apps for Identity
Security, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.grip.security/blog/extend-zero-trust-to-saas
39. Zero Trust Security for SaaS: Challenges
& Best Practices - Reco AI, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.reco.ai/learn/zero-trust-saas
40. Micro-Segmentation In Zero Trust
Architecture: A How-To Guide - Pilotcore, accessed April 27, 2025, https://pilotcore.io/blog/micro-segmentation-in-zero-trust-architecture
41. How a Zero Trust Strategy Built on
Microsegmentation Solves Cloud ..., accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.illumio.com/blog/how-a-zero-trust-strategy-built-on-microsegmentation-solves-cloud-risks
42. What is Identity Threat Detection and
Response (ITDR)? Definition ..., accessed April 27, 2025, https://appomni.com/saas-glossary/identity-threat-detection-and-response-itdr/
43. www.fbcinc.com, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.fbcinc.com/source/virtualhall_images/2024_Virtual_Events/DISA_J6/Anjuna/anjuna_whitepaper_confidential_AI_ML.pdf
44. Confidential Computing's Role In Ending
SaaS Data Breaches, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbestechcouncil/2025/01/30/confidential-computings-role-in-ending-saas-data-breaches/
45. An Open Letter to Third-Party Suppliers -
J.P. Morgan, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.jpmorgan.com/technology/technology-blog/open-letter-to-our-suppliers
46. Bring Your Own Cloud (BYOC): What is it and
why it's the future of deployment - Northflank, accessed April 27, 2025, https://northflank.com/blog/bring-your-own-cloud-byoc-future-of-enterprise-saas-deployment
47. SaaS Security: Risks, Technologies, and
Best Practices | Frontegg, accessed April 27, 2025, https://frontegg.com/blog/saas-security
48. 9 SaaS Security Best Practices: Checklist
for 2024 - Reco AI, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.reco.ai/learn/saas-security-best-practices
49. How do you handle security for your SaaS -
Reddit, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/SaaS/comments/1awe36z/how_do_you_handle_security_for_your_saas/
50. How To Balance Security And Rapid
Innovation In SaaS Development, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbestechcouncil/2025/03/04/how-to-balance-security-and-rapid-innovation-in-saas-development/
51. 7 SaaS Security Best Practices for 2025 -
Jit.io, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.jit.io/resources/app-security/7-saas-security-best-practices-for-2025
No comments:
Post a Comment