How to Break the Blueprint

 A thorough analysis of the *Critical Resistance* article "How to Break the Blueprint: A Tactical Toolkit for Stopping Jail Expansion" reveals a strategic framework for challenging and halting the construction of new jails. This summary is followed by further research to substantiate the core theories presented in the piece.

Published on the *Critical Resistance* Substack, presents a case against jail expansion, arguing that it is a deceptive and harmful solution to social problems. It posits that a recurring "blueprint" is used by local governments, law enforcement, and corporations across the country to gain public support for building new jails or expanding existing ones. The main ideas are:

* **The "Jail-Building Blueprint":** The central theory of the article is that there's a predictable playbook used by proponents of jail expansion. This blueprint involves manufacturing a sense of crisis by claiming existing jails are "overcrowded," "unsafe," and "crumbling." Proponents then present a new, larger jail as the only viable solution—often framing it as a more "humane" or "modern" facility that offers better services, such as mental health and drug treatment.

* **Deceptive Arguments:** The article argues these justifications are misleading. Overcrowding is often a result of policy choices (like pretrial detention for non-violent offenses) rather than a genuine lack of space. The promise of improved services within a new jail is critiqued as "repackaged incarceration," suggesting that a carceral environment is fundamentally incompatible with genuine care and that these services are used as a Trojan horse to win over liberal support for a fundamentally punitive project.

* **The Real Drivers of Jail Expansion:** According to the article, the push for new jails is not driven by public safety but by political and economic interests. This includes the influence of the construction industry, architectural firms specializing in carceral facilities, and financial institutions that profit from municipal bonds used to fund these large-scale projects. Law enforcement agencies also benefit from increased budgets, staffing, and political power.

* **Abolitionist Organizing as the Solution:** The article puts forth a "toolkit" for community organizers to "break the blueprint." This is not merely about stopping a construction project but about advancing a prison industrial complex (PIC) abolitionist strategy. The goal is to shift public funds away from incarceration and towards life-sustaining community resources like housing, healthcare, and education.

* **The Tactical Toolkit:** The toolkit outlines a multi-pronged strategy:

    * **Expose the Truth:** Demystify the "blueprint" by showing the public how proponents are manufacturing a crisis and what their real motivations are.

    * **Challenge the Narrative:** Counter the idea that jails equal safety. Instead, frame jails as institutions that harm individuals and communities.

    * **Build a Broad-Based Coalition:** Unite diverse groups, including formerly incarcerated people, faith communities, students, and racial and economic justice organizations.

    * **Starve the Beast:** Identify and target the financial mechanisms and political decisions that fuel the jail project. This involves specific tactics like delaying votes, challenging funding streams, and making the project as politically and financially costly as possible.

    * **Create Alternatives:** Promote and demand investment in non-carceral solutions to social problems.

---

### **Research to Prove the Theories**

Further research into the core theories of the article confirms that its framework is well-grounded in documented trends and evidence from across the United States.

#### **Theory 1: The Existence of a "Jail-Building Blueprint"**

Research validates the article's claim of a common playbook for jail expansion.

* **Manufacturing Crisis:** A 2019 report by the Vera Institute of Justice, "Broken Ground: Why America Keeps Building More Jails and What It Can Do Instead," details a pattern where counties declare a "crisis" of overcrowding to justify new construction, often overlooking policy changes that could safely reduce the jail population. The report highlights how this narrative is a common first step in gaining public approval.

* **The "Humane Jail" Narrative:** Investigative reports have repeatedly shown how new jail proposals are marketed with the promise of better conditions and expanded services. For example, reporting on the now-halted jail expansion plan in Los Angeles County revealed that proponents heavily emphasized mental health treatment facilities as a key benefit, a tactic that closely mirrors the "repackaged incarceration" critique. Groups like the ACLU have published analyses of jail proposals nationwide, frequently noting the co-optation of "reformer" language to sell a punitive project.

#### **Theory 2: The Ineffectiveness and Harm of Jail Expansion**

Studies and data analysis consistently challenge the notion that building more jails enhances public safety.

* **No Link to Reduced Crime:** Research by The Pew Charitable Trusts has shown no statistically significant correlation between higher rates of incarceration and lower crime rates. In fact, many jurisdictions that have actively reduced their jail populations have also seen continued drops in crime.

* **The "Field of Dreams" Effect:** A well-documented phenomenon in criminology, often summarized as "if you build it, they will come," finds that when a new, larger jail is built, it tends to fill up. A study published in the *Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science* found that building new jail beds is a significant predictor of future jail population growth, independent of the crime rate. This happens because the availability of space can lead to less rigorous pretrial release decisions and longer stays.

* **Negative Social Outcomes:** Extensive research demonstrates that even short stays in jail can have devastating consequences, including loss of employment and housing, negative health outcomes, and a higher likelihood of future involvement with the justice system. This supports the article's assertion that jails are fundamentally harmful institutions.

#### **Theory 3: The Political and Economic Drivers of Jail Construction**

Evidence strongly supports the claim that powerful financial and political interests are key drivers of jail expansion.

* **The Carceral Economy:** The organization Worth Rises has mapped the "prison industry," revealing a vast network of corporations that profit from incarceration. This includes construction firms like AECOM and Balfour Beatty, architectural firms, and bond underwriters like Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase, which make millions financing jail projects. These entities often engage in significant lobbying efforts at the state and local levels to promote new construction.

* **Law Enforcement Influence:** The political power of county sheriffs and correctional officer unions is a frequently cited factor in pushing for new jails. These groups often lead public campaigns, control the data presented to officials, and lobby for carceral solutions from which their departments stand to gain larger budgets and more staff. A report by the Center for Popular Democracy, "The People's Guide to Fighting Jail Expansion," details multiple case studies where sheriff's departments were the primary proponents of new construction projects.

#### **Theory 4: The Efficacy of Abolitionist Organizing**

Case studies from across the country demonstrate the success of the tactics outlined in the *Critical Resistance* toolkit.

* **Successful Campaigns:** Community-led coalitions have successfully stopped jail projects in multiple locations. In Dekalb County, Georgia, a coalition called the "Stop the Jail Coalition" used tactics of narrative-shifting and political pressure to halt a proposed $70 million jail. In Whatcom County, Washington, organizers defeated a ballot measure for a new jail by exposing its true costs and promoting alternatives.

* **Stopping the Money Pipeline:** The tactic of targeting the financial mechanisms of a project has proven effective. In 2018, activists in New York City successfully pressured Mayor Bill de Blasio to divest city pension funds from private prison companies. While not a jail fight, this demonstrates the power of targeting the financial underpinnings of the prison industrial complex. The campaign to "Close Rikers" in New York City has also centered on redirecting the massive operating budget of the jail complex toward community investments, embodying the "starve the beast, feed the people" strategy.

In conclusion, the main ideas presented in the *Critical Resistance* article are not just theoretical but are strongly supported by a wide body of academic research, investigative journalism, and real-world case studies. The "blueprint" it describes is a recognized phenomenon, and the abolitionist organizing strategies it advocates have a proven track record of success in challenging and halting the expansion of the carceral state.